Getting Buy-In For Flexible Working, Even From The Skeptical – Interview With Emma Francis

Clare Josa, Research & Training Director

Lack of flexible working was found in the 2019 Imposter Syndrome Research Study to be one of three hidden drivers of the gender pay gap. The increased out-of-hours commitment so often required in senior roles and the difficulty in fitting work around family was shown to disproportionately disadvantage women with school-aged children.

So Zurich Insurance decided to take bold action. Driven by data and a passion for diversity and inclusion, they have now succeeded in making 80% of their UK roles part time, flexi-time or job-share. And far from having a negative impact on the bottom line, they've seen astonishing results.

They're making measurable progress on closing the gender pay gap, and their employee engagement and satisfaction have increased. And all of this was during the challenges of the 2020 Covid-19 lockdown.

And in today's Lockdown Leadership Conference interview with Emma Francis, we're talking about:

Getting Buy-In For Flexible Working, Even From The Skeptical

What We Cover In This Interview:

In this candid and action-inspiring interview, Emma Francis - Head of Diversity & Inclusion for Zurich Insurance - shares:

  • what prompted them to take action
  • how they got buy-in from the key decision-makers
  • what people's concerns or initial objections were
  • how they overcame them
  • the benefits they have seen - it's not just gender equity
  • what advice Emma would give other companies who might be considering this route

Listen Now:

Watch The Interview:

Click To Read The Transcript - Please Forgive Typos!

Note: the video and podcast audio also have captions.



If you've read the 2019 Imposter Syndrome research study, you'll know that it found

three hidden drivers of the gender pay gap. And these explain why so many companies

have been trying so hard to close it and their success has stalled.

Those three hidden drivers were:

1. The alpha- male culture in so many companies at the most senior levels.

2. The second factor was the lack of flexible working for women who have school age

children or caring responsibilities or commitments outside of work,

with that increased time commitment

outside of hours that so often comes in leadership roles.

3. And the third factor was Imposter Syndrome.

We found hard data on how women were

holding back on applying for those promotions.

They weren't being as visible, they weren't speaking up with their best

ideas, and they weren't asking for the pay rises that they knew they deserved,

because of Imposter Syndrome.

If you want the full details, the white paper link is below this video.

And something happened in the last few weeks that gave me huge hope.

Zurich Insurance has run trial with turning 80 percent of their roles

into flexible working, part time roles or job shares.

And not only has it worked,

it has increased the proportion of women applying for more senior roles.

It has increased even more the proportion

of women who are actually getting those roles.

It is closing the gender pay gap.

It has increased employee satisfaction

and engagement, and they have rolled this out across the whole company.

I'm thrilled today that Emma Francis, who is Head of Diversity and Inclusion

at Zurich Insurance, has agreed to answer some of your

questions and some of my questions about how they did this.

What sparked the idea? How did they

overcome the naysayers, those who were objecting? How did they

make sure that this didn't damage the business and instead brought benefits?

And what advice would she give if you're looking at doing this in your business?

Thank you so much, Emma Francis, for joining me today.

So thank you so much for joining me

for this interview today about what Zurich Insurance has been doing on

part- time working, on flexible working and job sharing.

And I'd like to ask you few questions,

and I'd like to start with:

what was the point where the team made the decision, " we're actually going to do this"?

How did you know the time was right?

So we had been measuring our gender pay

gap and we had also been tracking the representation of females at all

the different levels in our organisation for quite few years.

And while our organisation is pretty much 50/50, male or female,

we had known for some time that our women tended to be overrepresented in the lower

grades and underrepresented in senior grades.

And we started on the journey of putting in place various interventions.

But the progress was slow.

mean, this is difficult stuff, isn't it?

And nobody has got the silver bullet yet that fixes the gender pay gap overnight.

So there was an awareness that it was tricky problem.

And at that time, the government decided to put some money behind some research

and they had commissioned some behavioural scientists to look at this.

And they happened to ask us, would you work with us on this program?

Would you be one of our partners?

So I'm always one for freebie!

And so but really like the idea of being

bold and really getting to the bottom of our data, which is what the behavioural

scientists were proposing to do , so that they could then design an intervention

that was focused purely on Zurich and our experience.

That would be sort of

nudge approach to behaviour change and really

bring some improvements in our gender pay gap.

Now, we couldn't have done it if hadn't

had really supportive head of H.R. who was,

"Yes, let's go for it.

Let's give it go!"

Steve is very committed to this issue and he's also

willing to take risks, you know, and it wasn't huge risk anyway.

But of course, it takes time and effort

and the data team and spending good deal of time on it.

So that was the

catalyst for getting involved.

So I think, you know, we had thorny problem,

we weren't quite sure what to do about it.

It wasn't changing.

So timing, fortuitous contact with someone in government.

And and then before we knew, we were part of this program and really excited

about the insights that the behavioural scientists were giving us.

And, you know, we're data based organisation, we're an insurance company.

We actually have these skills in-house.

But we had never looked at our data in that way.

And of course,

what the behavioural scientists then brought was some ideas around

the intervention that perhaps we wouldn't have thought of ourselves.

So it was it was very helpful to get their input.

Perfect.

So one of the things lot of companies do is they spent lot of time defending

the model and everybody works full time and it's only the lower skilled jobs

that could be part time or flexible working or even job share.

How did you get the buy in from the key decision makers in the company to say,

actually, we're going to do this despite all of those preconceptions and it will

not just not damage the business, it will actually benefit the business?

think it was using the arguments

that we use around D&I more generally, actually, primarily it's about talent.

But how do we get the talented people into our business that we really want?

We say that we want to be the employer of choice, because we know that talent

drives business results and better outcomes for our customers.

So we said to our key stakeholders, this would hopefully open up all sorts of

new talent bases that we can't access currently.

Think of all those people who don't want

to work full time, but have enormous experience.

And actually, you know,

you might think that company like Zurich attracts loads of applicants.

But the thing is, lot of our roles are very niche.

And if you're trying to recruit property

underwriter in Farnborough, they're not that thick on the ground.

So, you know, the average number of applicants per roll

prior to this intervention was 12.

So it's not that many.

And that was reflected the fact that some of our roles

will get hundreds and hundreds of applicants.

Some of them might get one or two.

But how do we open up that talent base?

But it's also about innovation,

about reflecting our customers better.

We need more diversity if we're going to truly understand and serve our

customers more effectively.

And also just being fair

and not having these sort of rigid rules on what job looks like.

And, you know, there's no

reason why all jobs need to be full time. Some jobs, y es.

Perhaps customer facing

you do want somebody available for

35 hours or however long it is.

But some roles d on't need to be. They don't need to be full time.

It's just habit that we always say, "oh, yes, I've got the headcount.

So must make it full time role." And you don't want to lose the funding.

"I managed to persuade

the cost centre to give me however much money for full time role.

So why would give up some of that funding,"

Some odd thinking processes that go on sometimes!

That's brilliant.

And Emma, know one of the things that many of us have come across anecdotally or

in personal experience historically is, for example, if mother of school- aged

child says, "right, actually, want to finish at four today so can go

to little Freddie's school play," that can be seen as really

career- limiting decision.

How did you handle the cultural change

that needed to happen with everybody, not just the key decision makers on that?

So for number of years now,

we've implemented what we call flex work, but it's agile working.

So this can apply to people,

whether they work full time or whether they work part time hours.

And it's the idea that you empower your people to work where,

when and how they choose, in order to deliver on their business commitments.

So we'd rolled that out across the whole

company in 2017 and I'm not going to pretend overnight

suddenly everyone was enlightened

and saying, "you know, off you go to your school assembly!" or whatever it might be.

But actually the majority were engaged

and it was habit that we have picked up as an organisation.

And so the principle that you shouldn't micromanage your

people, that we employ adults at Zurich, we pay them good money.

Therefore, they shouldn't need to be micromanaged.

And that for in order to attract the best people, but also to retain the best people,

we need to understand that people have lives outside of work.

If you haven't got child, then you've probably got a hobby,

or you've got parents you need to look after

or, you know, one of our employees is vicar.

So he really likes to go off and do an occasional harvest festival service.

And we've all got interests outside work.

And sometimes the car needs an MOT.

So just allowing people that flexibility,

we have discovered that our employees then repay us

in leaps and bounds. The loyalty and the commitment.

So that that concept of allowing flexibility in the workplace was there.

When it comes to actually reducing your hours.

think it comes back to just having conversation.

So I'm going back to the property underwriter are in Farnborough.

The cost, ,

the people who can fill that role, there's not so many people who apply.

You want to talk to everyone who can do that role.

If they turn around and say, "well, you know,

need little bit of flexibility or I'd only like to work three days, four days."

Well, let's have that conversation!

Let's talk about flex work as well.

Does that does that give you more comfort

that you will be able to balance your work and home life?

And you know what?

Can we make work that works for the employee and the business?

So think, with the part time job, our campaign

is very much about sending that message that we're up for conversation.

We can't guarantee that every role will be available two days week.

But come to us.

Let's talk and let's see what we can make work for both parties.

That's brilliant.

It sounds like you laid the foundations already to move away from the culture

of presenteeism to actually, as you say with the agile working,

looking at, well, have you delivered your objectives, which allowed people to take

more responsibility themselves and will have started the cultural change that made

it easier for you when you set that intention of.

Right.

think it is 80 percent of your roles now fit under this?

What's the figure?

Yes.

Yeah, that's right. Yes.

So very, very impressive.

And so I'd love to ask you what the benefits are that you've seen.

We've seen in the media some incredible figures on the percentage of women now

applying for these roles and actually the percentage of women getting these roles.

So I'd love to hear about that.

And also, what are the benefits

that you've seen for the employees and for the organisation?

Sure. So it's been really exciting.

And the the involvement of the behavioural

scientists means that there's been very rigorous analysis of the impact.

So there's no skewing the figures with them, you know,

they're very academic in their approach.

So overall, we've seen 16 percent increase in applications from women,

which is brilliant because, you know, we have

historically had fewer applications from women than men into our organisation.

But most excitingly think,

the applications from women for senior roles has increased by 20 percent.

Wow. So that's massive number.

And then guess the ultimate aim of all of this:

we've seen an increase in appointments of senior women increase by 33 percent.

So, you know, that is

that's the ultimate aim, isn't it?

And the number of people working part time has increased massively.

But we put that down to the fact

that actually this conversation that we're encouraging people to have,

if people get the comfort that they've got some flexibility, even when working full

time, they perhaps don't need those part time hours in quite the same way.

And what has been also very encouraging is

that applications for men have also increased, so that average number

of applicants per role has more than doubled.

So that's very heartening, isn't it?

And it just shows that, you know,

men want that flexibility as much as women, we think.

And, you know, we've also introduced equal

maternity and paternity pay and we're seeing nearly all of the men

who qualify for that take the full four months that they're entitled to.

So that sort of message is coming back to us in number of ways that are

male colleagues really want to be part of this team.

So when think about the wider

impact, think it comes back to that that talent piece.

You know, we we want the best person for the role.

And we acknowledge that not everyone,

that that person will want to work full time, or they might want some flexibility.

So, you know, getting some

great diverse talent into our organisation.

But it's also, think, empowered our employees to

think about their own roles and how they

can really embrace flexibility. And for sure, Covid's

been one of the few silver linings of this whole horrible lockdown has been the

the proof that flexible working, that working offsite can absolutely work.

And we know, of course, it's not perfect and it would be fantastic

to see colleagues face to face for at least some of the time.

But we've surveyed our employees

and they've told us loud and clear that they want increased flexibility

whenever we go back into the corporate world in terms of

not being expected to sit at the desk in the office, 9:00 to 5:00.

So think the culture has really

matured and that's come through in our

employee listening exercise that we did over the summer.

The numbers have increased hugely and in terms of employee engagement.

So that's not all down to flexible working, but think it's generally around

that sort of grown up progressive view of employment.

If you empower your employees,

if you trust them, then they pay you back in commitment,

productivity, and engagement in spades. It's wonderful.

So Emma it sounds like you kind of took one for the team industry-wide by working

with the behavioural scientists and then actually putting this into action.

You took risk that hasn't just paid off.

It's actually showcased now what we could all be achieving.

If you were to advise another company that's considering this,

say there's another head of HR or Diversity & Inclusion who's thinking, "yeah,

we know this is factor in the gender pay gap, we're going to do it!"

Or if you the 'you' few years ago when you first started talking about this,

if you were to give that 'you' some advice, what advice would you give?

And is there anything that you would do differently?

Yeah, that's interesting.

would encourage people,

any organisation, to give it go because of the good results that we've got.

And because you're not promising anything.

You're setting yourself up, you're indicating your willingness to talk

flexibility, your willingness to have conversation.

But ultimately, if a role needs to be done full time,

then you don't have to give it to somebody who works part time.

So you've got nothing to lose. But if you do do it,

then all sorts of interesting people are going to come out of the woodwork

that you, you know, I've heard stories of managers

who were initially skeptical in our organisation.

But then when the talent came through,

they were just blown away by who was on offer.

So they was like, "well, obviously,

whatever it takes, I'll get this person in."

So, as with anything, give it go.

And if it doesn't work out, then you can always change it.

You don't have to sign in blood.

And if I was going to go about it differently?

I'm not I'm not sure there's much I'd reflect on and regret.

There's still some of our roles that we,

the business leaders, feel would be difficult to accommodate as

part time, and that's my next challenge, to work with them,

to think about how it could be done more flexibly.

And that comes down to,

always believe it comes down to mindset: if you want to do something,

you can always make it work, can't you?

If you've got that mindset that you want to achieve it.

Whereas if you think, "oh,

that's too difficult," well, you're not going to make it happen.

So

think, work with the people who really believe in it.

Start with the believers. Get them to prove that it works.

And then you can move on to the people

who are perhaps more skeptical or who can't see how it will work for them.

And they'll soon be won over or their competitive streak will kick

in and they'll say, "you know, want some of that!"

So, yeah, you can always start small or

trial in certain business area if there is nervousness.

But, you know, it's been it's been really positive thing for us.

And always come back to, if you've got the data,

if you've analysed your data, you can prove whether where

the bottleneck is, the kink in the hose pipe

that's stopping people flow through, as I've heard it referred to.

Then you can address that kink,

really focus your intervention, because in the D&I world,

there are so many things that you can put in place aren't there whether it's

blind CVs or mentoring or whatever it might be.

But you might be directing your effort and your funding at the wrong thing.

So, yes, just being clear on the issue you're

trying to solve and then designing an intervention that addresses that.

That's brilliant. Thank you.

And love what you just said there about start with the believers,

because so often when we want to create change, we think we've got to start

with convincing the people who are anti. And actually trialling it

with the believers is very easy way of convincing those who might be more

skeptical and as you say, bringing out their competitive streak,

so they want to be involved in it, too.

That's amazing! To wrap up:

Is there anything else that you'd like to say?

just think it's

sign of maturity, in way, in an organisation,

think if you can cope with flexibility, part time, full time workers,

because it's all about focusing on the customer and delivering

for the customer the absolute best for the customer.

And in business, we always talk about empowering our

employees, how important it is to empower them.

And then what used to see,

you know, 10 or so years ago, was actually lot of micromanagement and "oh, we

couldn't possibly let our junior people do do their own thing!

They need supervising!" Well, lot of those junior people were

women who'd done the job for 20 or 30 years, were supremely

skilled in their role and experienced.

They didn't need somebody looking over their shoulder all the time.

So just, as you can tell, I'm massive proponent of this and I

encourage anyone in our positions to just give it go.

And because, think, it's it's the new world.

It's the future. And the sooner you get with the program,

the more you have the opportunity to reap the benefits.

That's brilliant. Thank you so much, Emma.

You're welcome .

Thank you again to Emma Francis,

Head of Diversity and I nclusion at Zurich Insurance. And for you watching this.

Thank you for taking the time.

really hope that you found this useful.

The research study is below this video.

There's also downloadable transcript of Emma's interview,

if you want to be able to share her key insights with those in your company to be

able to start this journey for yourselves or take it to that next level.

I'd love to hear from you.

What action are you going to take as

result of watching Emma's interview today?

How might you find your believers

and start working with them so that you can create positive wave of change?

That adult conversation,

as Emma describes it, in your business, to help close the gender pay gap so

that every role is available to the person who is the best fit for the role,

who has the skills, the talent and the potential,

rather than being determined by the number of working hours.

Get in touch. I'd love to hear from you.

And if you've got story that could

inspire people about what you've been doing on diversity, inclusion,

closing the gender pay gap, Ditching Imposter Syndrome get in touch.

I'd love to interview you for future episode.

Watch Each Interview For The 2021 Lockdown Leadership Conference 

Get your free ticket here:

Take Action Now!

If you do one thing as a result of this episode, make it this! What one action could you take today to encourage and support more flexible working in your organisation?

For My Organisation

Which roles might we be able to offer more flexibly, to attract the best candidates and foster work-life balance?

For Myself

What does flexible working mean to me? And how might I have that discussion with my organisation? 

Tweetables

[click_to_tweet tweet=”The benefits of making jobs more flexible – and how one company did it with 80% of their roles. Find out more in the #SoulLedLeaders podcast: #FlexiWork #MakingHybridWork” quote=”The benefits of making jobs more flexible – and how one company did it with 80% of their roles.”]

[click_to_tweet tweet=”How do you get buy-in, even from the skeptical, when you want to introduce #Flexiwork? Find out in the #SoulLedLeaders podcast #MakingHybridWork – ” quote=”How do you get buy-in, even from the skeptical, when you want to introduce #Flexiwork?”]

Loved This? Want More?

Make sure you're on the newsletter (you can grab your spot here) and also subscribe to the podcast https://soulledleaders.captivate.fm/listen.

Practical Inspiration For Soul Led Leaders

Catch each episode and get my weekly Soul Led Leaders email, with extra strategies, bonus resources, and accountability for your Soul Led Leadership journey.

Which best describes you? I want to send you the most relevant strategies.

Please select one:
  • Employed in a leadership role
  • Employed in a non-leadership role
  • Running my own business / freelancer
  • Student or not currently employed

Spam stinks. Your contact details will only be used to send you the Soul Led Leaders newsletter and related events.

And you can catch past episodes here:

Loved this? Spread the word


About the Author 

Clare Josa

Clare is considered a global authority in the fields of Imposter Syndrome, burnout and sustainable performance for individuals and teams. She has been an international keynote speaker for over 20 years.

Her research is cited in PhDs and taught on MBAs, worldwide, and she is the creator of the life-changing Safe to THRIVE™ and Natural Resilience Method® frameworks, which she teaches at Facilitator and Master Coach levels, as well as in the world's first Imposter Syndrome App - Imposter Syndrome Hacks™.

The author of ten books, a reformed engineer, and the former Head of Market Research for one of the world's most disruptive brands, she blends science-backed practical inspiration with demystified ancient wisdom, to help you create breakthroughs in ways that are fast, fun and forever.

Want more?